Security-X

Forum Security-X => News => Discussion démarrée par: igor51 le novembre 10, 2017, 14:00:44

Titre: [FireEye]General Michael Hayden Talks about the Future of Cybersecurity at MIRcon 2013
Posté par: igor51 le novembre 10, 2017, 14:00:44
General Michael Hayden Talks about the Future of Cybersecurity at MIRcon 2013


 

When you've got some of the cybersecurity industry's best and
    brightest practitioners in one room, just how do you top the
    conversations they're having across the breakfast table? By getting
    one of the foremost experts on cybersecurity to deliver a top notch
    speech on the future of the industry, threat actors, and strategies
    for businesses to survive and prosper in a hostile environment! This
    was the scene last week as General Michael Hayden, a thirty-nine
    year military veteran, former director of the National Security
    Administration (NSA) and CIA, and currently Principal at the
    Chertoff Group, addressed a packed house at       href="http://www.mandiant.com/events/mircon/"
      target="_blank">MIRcon® 2013
.

Hayden framed
    his talk by identifying the three key players in the cybersecurity
    arena - the attackers, the government, and the

    class="size-medium wp-image-5310 "
    style="border: 2.0px solid black;margin: 5.0px;"
    alt="MIRcon Keynote General Michael Hayden"
    src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/legacy/ammo/Gen-Hayden_MIRcon-2013-300x200.jpg"
    width="300" height="200" />MIRcon Keynote General Michael
    Hayden

private sector. He gave the room pause for thought as he
    described how both state-based threat vectors and private groups and
    individuals are becoming more sophisticated and more deliberate in
    their cyber attacks. Using the analogy of the rising tide lifting
    all boats, Hayden explained that all attackers are becoming better
    at what they do and less interested in data theft and more in
    system-wide destruction.

In his opinion, this change from
    criminal mischief to societal level destruction is why governments
    have a legitimate role to play in cyber-defenses. The key issue,
    however, especially for the United States is that as a country,
    we've yet to know what role we want the government to play in
    securing our online environment. Where the role of government is
    very clear cut in other domains of engagement (land, sea, air, and
    space), cyber-defense is far more complicated particularly because,
    as the Snowden affair and other recent issues have demonstrated,
    privacy and other issues of freedom of information are at the core
    of the solution.

Cue the private sector.

Given its
    dual role as provider of cybersecurity solutions and principal
    target of cyber-attacks, the private sector, in Hayden's opinion is
    "the engine of innovation" in the cyber realm. In fact,
    while the government provides the solutions in other domains of
    engagement, in the cyber realm, private industry, based on their
    knowledge, expertise, and hands-on experience, should be the lead
    and the government should act in a supporting capacity. Given the
    current situation where cybersecurity legislation has either died on
    the vine, or is stalled in Congress, if we want the types of
    regulation that will lead to better cyber-defenses - and in a timely
    manner - then the private sector needs to forge ahead with what it's
    already started.

For Hayden, the most valuable avenue of
    cyber-defense will come from the cybersecurity companies working
    with businesses and insurance companies to codify risk and
    resilience to ensure that the consequences of inaction in
    implementing genuine cyber-defenses becomes clear. Using examples of
    car and homeowners' insurance, Hayden outlined a compelling case for
    an insurance-driven approach to cybersecurity. In essence, by taking
    actions akin to requiring your children to take drivers' education,
    or knowing the composition of the shingles on your roof, the home
    insurance consumer uses knowledge to reduce risk. And, in turn, the
    insurer rewards that knowledge and awareness through lower premiums
    motivating consumers to act in less risky ways to achieve a more
    preferable rating. In his words, a "cyber insurance regime may
    actually enforce cyber standards that we would find offensive from
    the government, but that we'll accept for favorable
  insurance."

Nothing like starting the day off with a
    radical idea is there? What do you think of General Hayden's vision
    for driving cybersecurity preparedness and compliance?


Source: General Michael Hayden Talks about the Future of Cybersecurity at MIRcon 2013 (http://)