Security-X

Forum Security-X => News => Discussion démarrée par: igor51 le janvier 09, 2018, 02:00:58

Titre: [FireEye]Double-edged Sword: Australia Economic Partnerships Under Attack from China
Posté par: igor51 le janvier 09, 2018, 02:00:58
Double-edged Sword: Australia Economic Partnerships Under Attack from China

During a visit in mid-September, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi
  urged Australia to become “a bridge between east and west.” He was
  Down Under to discuss progress on the     href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-13/australia-says-boosting-japan-ties-won-t-delay-china-fta.html">free
    trade agreement between Australia and China that seems likely by
  the end of the year. His comment referred to furthering the trade
  relationship between the two countries, but he might as well have been
  referring to hackers who hope to use the deepening alliance to steal information.


 

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) did an     href="http://www.afr.com/p/technology/china_ramps_up_spying_on_australian_RAWfIGZ4USnF8RHWsbnA8K">in-depth
  article with FireEye regarding Chinese attacks against Australian
  businesses, and this blog provides additional context.


 

Australia has experienced unprecedented trade growth with China over
  the last decade, which has created a double-edged sword. As Australian
  businesses partner with Chinese firms, Chinese-based threat actors
  increasingly launch sophisticated and targeted network attacks to
  obtain confidential information from Australian businesses. In the
  U.S. and Europe, Chinese attacks on government and private industry
  have become a routine in local newspapers.  Australia, it seems, is
  the next target.


 


   The Numbers


 

First, let’s review the state of Australian and Chinese economic
  interdependence.  Averaging an annual 9.10% GDP growth rate over the
  last two decades, China’s unparalleled economic expansion has
  protected Australia from the     href="http://www.tradingeconomics.com/china/gdp-growth-annual">worst
    of the global financial crisis effects.     href="http://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/stats-pubs/australias-exports-to-china-2001-2011.pdf">Exports
    to China have increased tenfold, from $8.3b USD in 2001 to $90b
  USD in 2013[i], with the most prominent commodities being     href="https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/fs/chin.pdf">iron ore and natural
  gas. Much of these resources originate in Australia, which puts
  China’s government under significant pressure to meet the skyrocketing
  demand for them. Despite the ever-increasing co-dependence Australia
  and China share as regional partners, Chinese authorities are likely
  supporting greater levels of monitoring and intelligence gathering
  from the Australian economy - often conducted through Chinese
  State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) with domestic relationships in Australia.


 

SOE direct investment into Australia grew to 84% of all foreign
  investment inflows from China in 2014, primarily directed into the
  Australian mining and resource sector; demonstrating a further signal
  for control as China seeks to capture a level of certainty in catering
  for its future internal growth. We suspect this to be
  government-commissioned cyber threat actors targeting Australian firms
  with a specific agenda: to gain advantage and control of assets both
  in physical infrastructure and intellectual property.


 


        height="263" alt="chn"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2014/10/chn.png" class="aligncenter wp-image-6692 landscape-sm" />


 

Figure 1.     href="http://www.heritage.org/research/projects/china-global-investment-tracker-interactive-map">Chinese
    Direct Investment into Australia by industry


 


  The Impacts


 

How have these partnerships impacted Australian networks?  Mandiant
  has observed the strategic operations of Chinese threat actors target
  companies involved in key economic sectors, including data theft from
  an Australian firm.  Chinese Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) are
  likely interested in compromising Australian mining and natural
  resources firms, especially after spikes in commodity prices. The
  upward trend in APT attacks from China is also aimed toward the third
  parties in the mining and natural resources ecosystems. Mandiant
  believes a significant increase in China-based APT intrusions focused
  on law firms that hold confidential mergers and acquisitions
  information and sensitive intellectual property. It is no coincidence
  these third-party firms are often found lacking in network
  protections. The investigation also found that, at the time of
  compromise, the majority of victim firms were in direct negotiations
  with Chinese enterprises, highlighting attempts by the Chinese
  government to gain advantage in targeted areas.


 

Due to its endemic pollution problems, clean energy has evolved into
  a critical industry for China. The country has now engaged a plan to
  develop Strategic Emerging Industries (SEIs) to address this.
  Australian intellectual property and R&D have become prime data,
  and has taken a major position in Chinese APT campaigns. Again, it is
  the third parties like law firms that are coming under attack.


 

Furthermore, to reduce China’s reliance on Australian iron ore
  exports, Beijing has initiated a plan to develop an efficient,
  high-end steel production vertical through strategic acquisitions in
  Australia and intervening to prevent unfavorable alliances.  For
  example, the SOE Chinalco bought into Australian mining companies to
  presumably prevent a merger that would have disadvantaged their
  interests. Clearly, the confidential business information of
  Australian export partners to China is     href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-31/china-based-hackers-target-law-firms.html">becoming
    increasingly sought after.


 

Mandiant found that the majority of compromised firms had either
  current negotiation with Chinese enterprises or previous business
  engagements with Chinese enterprises. These attacks will persist as
  trade and investment grows, though they will do so at the cost of
  confidential Australian business information such as R&D and
  intellectual property. As large Australian mining and resources firms
  themselves may partner with the Australian Signals Directorate for
  security, the focus of the threat actors shifts to associated parties
  with access to sensitive data, who may not be pursuing partnerships
  with the Australian Signals Directorate.  This calls for greater
  awareness and protection against the increasingly determined and
  advanced attacks launched.


 


  The Bottom Line


 

Although this blog focuses on acts against large Australian mining
  and resources sectors, Mandiant has observed these APT actors often
  focusing their attention on other sectors such as defence,
  telecommunications, agriculture, political organizations, high
  technology, transportation, and aerospace, among others. But the
  broader lesson and message—drawing from U.S. and European experience
  with Chinese attacks—is that no one is or will be exempt.  For all
  Australian businesses and governments, it’s time to fortify defences
  for a new era of cyber security.


 

 


 

[i]"Australian Government Department of Foreign Trade and
  Affairs. www.dfat.gov.au/publications/stats-pubs/australiasexports-


 

 


Source: Double-edged Sword: Australia Economic Partnerships Under Attack from China (http://)