Auteur Sujet: [FireEye]Putting the Model to Work: Enabling Defenders With Vulnerability Intelligence — Intelligence for Vulnerability Management, Part Four  (Lu 3077 fois)

0 Membres et 1 Invité sur ce sujet

Hors ligne igor51

  • Admin
  • Mega Power Members
  • *****
  • Messages: 10419
Putting the Model to Work: Enabling Defenders With Vulnerability
Intelligence — Intelligence for Vulnerability Management, Part Four



  One of the critical strategic and tactical roles that cyber threat
    intelligence (CTI) plays is in the tracking, analysis, and
    prioritization of software vulnerabilities that could potentially
    put an organization’s data, employees and customers at risk. In this
    four-part blog series, FireEye Mandiant Threat Intelligence
    highlights the value of CTI in enabling vulnerability management,
    and unveils new research into the latest threats, trends and recommendations.


 

Organizations often have to make difficult choices when it comes to
  patch prioritization. Many are faced with securing complex network
  infrastructure with thousands of systems, different operating systems,
  and disparate geographical locations. Even when armed with a
  simplified     href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/how-mandiant-intelligence-rates-vulnerabilities.html">vulnerability
    rating system, it can be hard to know where to start. This
  problem is compounded by the ever-changing threat landscape and     href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/zero-day-exploitation-demonstrates-access-to-money-not-skill.html">increased
    access to zero-days.


 

At FireEye, we apply the rich body of knowledge accumulated over
  years of global intelligence collection, incident response
  investigations, and device detections, to help our customers defend
  their networks. This understanding helps us to discern between
  hundreds of newly disclosed vulnerabilities to provide ratings and
  assessments that empower network defenders to focus on the most
  significant threats and effectively mitigate risk to their organizations. 


 

In this blog post, we’ll demonstrate how we apply intelligence to
  help organizations assess risk and make informed decisions about
  vulnerability management and patching in their environments.


 

Functions of Vulnerability Intelligence


 

Vulnerability intelligence helps clients to protect their
  organizations, assets, and users in three main ways:


 


      src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/vulnintel/Picture1.png" alt="" />
 
 Figure 1: Vulnerability intelligence can
    help with risk assessment and informed decision making


 

Tailoring Vulnerability Prioritization


 

We believe it is important for organizations to build a defensive
  strategy that prioritizes the types of threats that are most likely to
  impact their environment, and the threats that could cause the most
  damage. When organizations have a clear picture of the spectrum of
  threat actors, malware families, campaigns, and tactics that are most
  relevant to their organization, they can make more nuanced
  prioritization decisions when those threats are linked to exploitation
  of vulnerabilities. A lower risk vulnerability that is actively being
  exploited in the wild against your organization or similar
  organizations likely has a greater potential impact to you than a
  vulnerability with a higher rating that is not actively being exploited.


 


      src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/vulnintel/Picture2.png" alt="" />
 
 Figure 2: Patch Prioritization Philosophy


 

Integration of Vulnerability Intelligence in Internal Workflows


 

Based on our experience assisting organizations globally with
  enacting intelligence-led security, we outline three use cases for
  integrating vulnerability intelligence into internal workflows.


 


      src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/vulnintel/Picture3.png" alt="" />
 
 Figure 3: Integration of vulnerability
    intelligence into internal workflows


 


  Tools and Use Cases for Operationalizing Vulnerability Intelligence


 


  1. Automate Processes by Fusing Intelligence with Internal Data


 

Automation is valuable to security teams with limited
  resources. Similar to automated detecting and blocking of indicator
  data, vulnerability threat intelligence can be automated by merging
  data from internal vulnerability scans with threat intelligence (via
  systems like the Mandiant     href="https://www.fireeye.com/solutions/cyber-threat-intelligence/threat-intelligence-subscriptions/intelligence-api.html">Intelligence
  API) and aggregated into a SIEM, Threat Intelligence Platform,
  and/or ticketing system. This enhances visibility into various sources
  of both internal and external data with vulnerability intelligence
  providing risk ratings and indicating which vulnerabilities are being
  actively exploited. FireEye also offers a custom tool called FireEye
  Intelligence Vulnerability Explorer (“FIVE”), described in more detail
  below for quickly correlating vulnerabilities found in logs and scans
  with Mandiant ratings.


 

Security teams can similarly automate communication and workflow
  tracking processes using threat intelligence by defining rules for
  auto-generating tickets based on certain combinations of Mandiant risk
  and exploitation ratings; for example,
  internal service-level-agreements (SLAs) could state that ‘high’ risk
  vulnerabilities that have an exploitation rating of ‘available,’
  ‘confirmed,’ or ‘wide’ must be patched within a set number of days. Of
  course, the SLA will depend on the company’s operational needs, the
  capability of the team that is advising the patch process, and
  executive buy-in to the SLA process. Similarly, there may be an SLA
  defined for patching vulnerabilities that are of a certain age. Threat
  intelligence tells us that adversaries continue to use older
  vulnerabilities as long as they remain effective. For example, as
  recently as January 2020, we observed a Chinese cyber espionage group
  use an exploit for CVE-2012-0158, a Microsoft Office stack-based
  buffer overflow vulnerability originally released in 2012, in
  malicious email attachments to target organizations in Southeast
  Asia. Automating the vulnerability-scan-to-vulnerability-intelligence
  correlation process can help bring this type of issue to light. 


 

Another potential use case employing automation would be
  incorporating vulnerability intelligence as security teams are testing
  updates or new hardware and software prior to introduction into the
  production environment. This could dramatically reduce the number of
  vulnerabilities that need to be patched in production and help
  prioritize those vulnerabilities that need to be patched first based
  on your organization’s unique threat profile and business operations.


 


  2. Communicating with Internal Stakeholders


 

Teams can leverage vulnerability reporting to send internal
  messaging, such as flash-style notifications, to alert other teams
  when Mandiant rates a vulnerability known to impact your systems high
  or critical. These are the vulnerabilities that should take priority
  in patching and should be patched outside of the regular cycle.


 

Data-informed intelligence analysis may help convince stakeholders
  outside of the security organization the importance of patching
  quickly, even when this is inconvenient to business operations. Threat
  Intelligence can inform an organization’s appropriate use of resources
  for security given the potential business impact of security incidents.


 


  3. Threat Modeling


 

Organizations can leverage vulnerability threat intelligence to
  inform their threat modeling to gain insight into the most likely
  threats to their organization, and better prepare to address threats
  in the mid to long term. Knowledge of which adversaries pose the
  greatest threat to your organization, and then knowledge of which
  vulnerabilities those threat groups are exploiting in their
  operations, can enable your organization to build out security
  controls and monitoring based on those specific CVEs.


 

Examples


 

The following examples illustrate workflows supported by
  vulnerability threat intelligence to demonstrate how organizations can
  operationalize threat intelligence in their existing security teams to
  automate processes and increase efficiency given limited resources.


 


  Example 1: Using FIVE for Ad-hoc Vulnerability Prioritization


 

The FireEye Intelligence Vulnerability Explorer (“FIVE”) tool is
  available for customers   href="https://fireeye.market/apps?query=five">here. It is
  available for MacOS and Windows, requires a valid subscription for
  Mandiant Vulnerability Intelligence, and is driven from an API integration.


 


      src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/vulnintel/Picture4.png" alt="" />
 
 Figure 4: FIVE Tool for Windows and MacOS


 

In this scenario, an organization’s intelligence team was asked to
  quickly identify any vulnerability that required patching from a
  server vulnerability scan after that server was rebuilt from a backup
  image. The intelligence team was presented with a text file containing
  a list of CVE numbers. Users can drag-and-drop a text readable file
  (CSV, TEXT, JSON, etc.) into the FIVE tool and the CVE numbers will be
  discovered from the file using regex. As shown in Figure 6 (below), in
  this example, the following vulnerabilities were found in the file and
  presented to the user. 


 


      src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/vulnintel/Picture5.png" alt="" />
 
 Figure 5: FIVE tool startup screen
    waiting for file input


 


      src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/vulnintel/Picture6.png" alt="" />
 
 Figure 6: FIVE tool after successfully
    regexing the CVE-IDs from the file


 

After selecting all CVE-IDs, the user clicked the “Fetch
  Vulnerabilities” button, causing the application to make the necessary
  two-stage API call to the Intelligence API.


 

The output depicted in Figure 7 shows the user which vulnerabilities
  should be prioritized based on FireEye’s risk and exploitation
  ratings. The red and maroon boxes indicate vulnerabilities that
  require attention, while the yellow indicate vulnerabilities that
  should be reviewed for possible action. Details of the vulnerabilities
  are displayed below, with associated intelligence report links
  providing further context.


 


      src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/vulnintel/Picture7.png" alt="" />
 
 Figure 7: FIVE tool with meta-data,
    CVE-IDs, and links to related Intelligence Reports


 

FIVE can also facilitate other use cases for vulnerability
  intelligence. For example, this chart can be attached in messaging to
  other internal stakeholders or executives for review, as part of a
  status update to provide visibility on the organization’s
  vulnerability management program.


 


  Example 2: Vulnerability Prioritization, Internal Communications,
    Threat Modeling


 

CVE-2019-19781 is a vulnerability affecting Citrix that Mandiant
  Threat Intelligence rated critical. Mandiant discussed early     href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/products-and-services/2020/01/rough-patch-promise-it-will-be-200-ok.html">exploitation
    of this vulnerability in a January 2020 blog post. We continued
  to monitor for additional exploitation, and informed our clients when
  we observed exploitation by ransomware operators and Chinese espionage
  group, APT41.


 

In cases like these, threat intelligence can help impacted
  organizations find the “signal” in the “noise” and prioritize patching
  using knowledge of exploitation and the motives and targeting patterns
  of threat actors behind the exploitation. Enterprises can use
  intelligence to inform internal stakeholders of the potential risk and
  provide context as to the potential business and financial impact of a
  ransomware infection or an intrusion by a highly resourced state
  sponsored group. This support the immediate patch prioritization
  decision while simultaneously emphasizing the value of a holistically
  informed security organization.


 


  Example 3: Intelligence Reduces Unnecessary Resource Expenditure —
    Automating Vulnerability Prioritization and Communications


 

Another common application for vulnerability intelligence is
  informing security teams and stakeholders when to stand down. When a
  vulnerability is reported in the media, organizations often spin up
  resources to patch as quickly as possible. Leveraging threat
  intelligence in security processes help an organization discern when
  it is necessary to respond in an all-hands-on-deck manner.


 

Take the case of the   href="https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-12650">CVE-2019-12650,
  originally disclosed on Sept. 25, 2019 with an NVD rating of “High.”
  Without further information, an organization relying on this score to
  determine prioritization may include this vulnerability in the same
  patch cycle along with numerous other vulnerabilities rated High or
  Critical. As previously discussed, we have experts     href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/how-mandiant-intelligence-rates-vulnerabilities.html">review
    the vulnerability and determine that it required the highest
  level of privileges available to successfully exploit, and there was
  no evidence of exploitation in the wild.


 

This is a case where threat intelligence reporting as well as
  automation can effectively minimize the need to unnecessarily spin up
  resources. Although the public NVD score rated this vulnerability
  high, Mandiant Intelligence rated it as “low” risk due to the high
  level of privileges needed to use it and lack of exploitation in the
  wild. Based on this assessment, organizations may decide that this
  vulnerability could be patched in the regular cycle and does not
  necessitate use of additional resources to patch out-of-band. When
  Mandiant ratings are automatically integrated into the patching ticket
  generation process, this can support efficient prioritization.
  Furthermore, an organization could use the analysis to issue an
  internal communication informing stakeholders of the reasoning behind
  lowering the prioritization.


 

Vulnerabilities: Managed


 

Because we have been closely monitoring vulnerability exploitation
  trends for years, we were able to distinguish when attacker use of   href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/zero-day-exploitation-demonstrates-access-to-money-not-skill.html">zero-days
  evolved from use by a select class of highly skilled attackers, to
  becoming accessible to less skilled groups with enough money to burn.
  Our observations consistently underscore the   href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/time-between-disclosure-patch-release-and-vulnerability-exploitation.html">speed
  with which attackers exploit useful vulnerabilities, and the lack of
  exploitation for vulnerabilities that are hard to use or do not help
  attackers fulfill their objectives. Our understanding of the threat
  landscape helps us to discern between hundreds of newly disclosed
  vulnerabilities to provide ratings and assessments that empower
  network defenders to focus on the most significant threats and
  effectively mitigate risk to their organizations.


 

Mandiant Threat Intelligence enables organizations to implement a
  defense-in-depth approach to holistically mitigate risk by taking all
  feasible steps—not just patching—to prevent, detect, and stymie
  attackers at every stage of the attack lifecycle with both technology
  and human solutions.


 

Register today to hear FireEye Mandiant Threat Intelligence experts
  discuss the latest in     href="https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/7451/392772">vulnerability
    threats, trends and recommendations in our upcoming April 30 webinar.


 


  Additional Resources


 


      href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/zero-day-exploitation-demonstrates-access-to-money-not-skill.html">Zero-Day
    Exploitation Increasingly Demonstrates Access to Money, Rather than
    Skill — Intelligence for Vulnerability Management, Part One


 


      href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/time-between-disclosure-patch-release-and-vulnerability-exploitation.html">Think
    Fast: Time Between Disclosure, Patch Release and Vulnerability
    Exploitation — Intelligence for Vulnerability Management, Part Two


 


      href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2020/04/how-mandiant-intelligence-rates-vulnerabilities.html">Separating
    the Signal from the Noise: How Mandiant Intelligence Rates
    Vulnerabilities — Intelligence for Vulnerability Management, Part Three


 

Mandiant offers     href="https://www.fireeye.com/solutions/cyber-threat-intelligence.html">Intelligence
    Capability Development (ICD) services to help organizations
  optimize their ability to consume, analyze and apply threat intelligence.


 

The FIVE tool is
    available on the FireEye Market
. It requires a valid
  subscription for Mandiant Vulnerability Intelligence, and is driven
  from an API integration. Please contact your Intelligence Enablement
  Manager or FireEye Support to obtain API keys. 


 

Mandiant's OT Asset Vulnerability Assessment Service informs
  customers of relevant vulnerabilities by matching a customer's asset
  list against vulnerabilities and advisories. Relevant vulnerabilities
  and advisories are delivered in a report from as little as once a
  year, to as often as once a week. Additional add-on services such as
  asset inventory development and deep dive analysis of critical assets
  are available. Please contact your Intelligence Enablement Manager for
  more information.


Source: Putting the Model to Work: Enabling Defenders With Vulnerability
Intelligence — Intelligence for Vulnerability Management, Part Four

Tags: