Auteur Sujet: [FireEye]The Mutter Backdoor: Operation Beebus with New Targets  (Lu 2954 fois)

0 Membres et 1 Invité sur ce sujet

Hors ligne igor51

  • Admin
  • Mega Power Members
  • *****
  • Messages: 10419
The Mutter Backdoor: Operation Beebus with New Targets


  FireEye Labs has
  observed a series of related attacks against a dozen organizations in
  the aerospace, defense, and telecommunications industries as well as
  government agencies located in the United States and India which have
  been occurring at least as early as December of 2011. In at least one
  case, a decoy document included in the attack contained content that
  focused on Pakistan military advancements in unmanned vehicle, or
  “drone” technology.


 

Technically, these attacks exploited previously discovered
  vulnerabilities via document files delivered by email in order to
  plant a previously unknown backdoor onto victim systems. The malware
  used in these attacks employs a number of interesting techniques to
  “hide in plain sight” and to evade dynamic malware analysis systems.
  Similar to, though not based on the attacks we saw in South Korea, the
  malware tries to stay inactive as long as possible to evade dynamic
  analysis detection methods.


 

We have linked these attacks back to     href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2013/02/operation-beebus.html">Operation
  Beebus through the C&C infrastructure along with the similar
  targets and timeline observed. Although some of the targets of these
  attacks overlapped with Beebus targets, there were many new targets
  discovered including some in India. As we uncover more targets related
  to these attacks, we are seeing a common link between them: unmanned
  vehicles, also known as “drones”. The set of targets cover all aspects
  of unmanned vehicles, land, air, and sea, from research to design to
  manufacturing of the vehicles and their various subsystems. Other
  related malware have been discovered through the same C&C
  infrastructure that have a similar set of targets, that when included
  bring the total number of targets to more than 20 as of this writing.
  These targets include some in academia which have received military
  funding for their research projects relating to unmanned vehicles.


 


  Infiltration


 

All of the attacks we have observed occurred through document
  exploits attacking known vulnerabilities. We have seen RTF and XLS
  files used for delivery. Searching the internet for the author and
  document names yields information regarding South Asia
  politics. Although all of the document exploits we have analyzed drop
  a decoy document, most of them are either empty or filled with
  unreadable data with two exceptions.


 


        class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1673 landscape-lg"
      alt="mutter-decoy-doc"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-decoy-doc.png"
      width="850" height="529" />


 

One is an article about Pakistan’s indigenous UAV industry which is
  attributed to author Aditi Malhotra, an Indian writer and Associate
  Fellow at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS) in New Delhi.
  Although we are not sure this particular work is actually hers, we did
  find a reference to a similarly named article “Pakistan’s UAV
  programme: Ambitious, with some friendly help.” Unfortunately, this
  document was not available. Other works of hers on a similar note
  include “India’s Silence on Chinese Incursions” and “China and
  Pakistan: Dangerous Liaisons.”


 

The other decoy document is contact info for an American with a
  military provided email address from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland,
  but with a physical address in Pakistan titled “Family Planning
  Association of Base (FPAB).” It looks like they took the “Family
  Planning Association of Bangladesh” and combined it with “Joint Base
  Andrews.” The title of the email field is “FPAP Email”, “FPAP” could
  stand for “Family Planning Association of Pakistan.” Ultimately, we
  could make no sense from this information.


 


  The Mutter Backdoor


 

Two different versions of the same backdoor were used in all of
  these attacks. In every case we have found, the main component is a
  DLL dropped by an executable compiled minutes after the DLL. The
  dropper shares the same decoding functions as the DLL and performs
  some modifications on the DLL that will be described later. There was
  one unique case we found where the initial dropper was a
  self-extracting archive that utilizes Visual Basic and batch scripts
  to download and install the DLL instead of extracting it from a resource.


 

Mutter is HTTP proxy aware, and attempts to determine if a proxy is
  required and what the proxy details are if necessary. It uses
  google.co.in to perform such tests. It uses HTTP to communicate with
  the C&C server and expects an encoded string between a pair of
  <p> tags in the response. The URL in the request
  has one parameter, “i”, which is set to an encoded representation of a
  string that follows this format:


 


  <Mutter version#>-<campaign marker?>-<victim
    hostname>-<victim IP address>


 

We are not certain about the second part of this string, it may be
  either a campaign marker or an extension of the version number. In all
  our cases, it is set to either “SN0” or “SN1." Actual strings are
  shared in the appendix information at the end of this blog.


 


        class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1674 landscape-med"
      alt="mutter-callback"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-callback.png"
      width="649" height="139" />


 

This HTTP request pictured in the screenshot is from the older
  version of Mutter. The newer versions of Mutter have a very similar
  HTTP request, but with the Host and
  Connection headers swapped.


 

The response string is decoded and parsed for the following commands:


 

“m”: executes a shell command


 

“u”: uploads a file to the victim (downloads a file from the
  victim’s perspective)


 

“d”: downloads a file to the attacker (uploads a file from the
  victim’s perspective)


 

“R”: removes the auto-run registry value


 

These commands are referenced in the code in this order, and when
  said aloud it sounds like “mutter”, hence the name chosen for the
  malware. In the earlier version of this backdoor, the “d” command was
  referenced, but the code had not been implemented yet. In both
  versions, another command string “f” appears along with the others,
  but is not referenced in the code. This perhaps indicates a future
  feature to be added.


 

This malware employs several interesting evasion techniques. For
  starters, it employs several “hide in plain sight” techniques common
  to malware used in targeted attacks. It specifies fake properties,
  pretending to be Google or Microsoft.


 


        href="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-dropper-properties.png">      class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1676 landscape-sm"
      alt="mutter-dropper-properties"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-dropper-properties.png"
      width="375" height="185" />


 


        href="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-dll-properties.png">      class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1675 portrait-sm"
      alt="mutter-dll-properties"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-dll-properties.png"
      width="377" height="515" />


 

This brings us to the next “hide in plain sight” tactic we noticed.
  Observe the size of the file above. It’s a whopping 41 megabytes. With
  rare exception, malware typically have a small size usually no larger
  than a few hundred kilobytes. When an investigator comes across a file
  megabytes in size, he may be discouraged from taking a closer look.
  Interestingly, the original size of this particular DLL is around 160
  kilobytes, although the PE headers already indicate its future size as
  shown below. The dropper will decode this DLL from its resource
  section, drop it onto the victim’s system, and proceed to fill its
  resource section with randomly generated data. This has another useful
  side effect of giving each DLL a unique hash, making it more difficult
  to identify.


 


        class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1677 landscape-med"
      alt="mutter-dll-size"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-dll-size.png"
      width="688" height="490" />


 

In addition to these hiding techniques, this malware also appears to
  employ techniques to possibly evade dynamic malware analysis systems.
  This has been an ongoing trend in malware development that we and
  others have observed several times in past. The malware author will
  add code to delay the execution of the important functionality for
  some period of time with the idea being that if the malware stalls for
  long enough, the dynamic malware analysis system will give up on it
  and pass it off as benign. This malware has two routines that we could
  find no other purpose than for such an evasion.


 

One routine is a function that simply runs a series of loops,
  incrementing a local variable over and over, thousands of times. It
  ultimately disregards the final value of this variable, meaning that
  the function serves no purpose. This function is called many times
  throughout the rest of the code. It may have been implemented for the
  purpose of wasting time.


 

Another routine seems to have a similar goal, but with a different
  approach. This time, a loop is implemented with a call to sleep for a
  short time. This loop occurs many times, and each time it will also
  allocate a chunk of memory on the heap, performing math operations on
  it and printing it to the console over and over again. Keep in mind
  that this memory is not initialized to any value and is not used for
  anything later in the code, it is essentially junk memory. This seems
  to be another means of wasting time.


 

We detect this malware as Backdoor.APT.NS01.


 


  C&C Details


 

Most of the domains registered for C&C use in this campaign were
  done so through the free dynamic DNS Provider ChangeIP.com. Dynamic
  DNS is a popular option for domain registration since it is free and
  provides a convenient level of anonymity.  Looking at passive DNS
  records for other domains pointing to the IP addresses used to host
  the C&C services turned up many other related domains. Various
  subdomains of the domain winsupdate.com have pointed to several IPs
  pointed to by the Mutter domains. This is interesting because this is
  the name of the folder created by Mutter on victims’ systems.
  Furthermore, this domain is not a publicly available dynamic DNS
  provider and the email address used to register this domain is
  binalakshminp@yahoo.com.  We cannot be certain, but this
  name could be in reference to Binalakshmi Nepram, a writer-activist
  born in Manipur India who is fighting for disarmament. This fits the
  theme we have observed from other clues left behind in decoy
  documents. Another domain that is indirectly linked is
  agfire.com with this interesting registration information.


 


        class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1678 portrait-sm"
      alt="mutter-agfire-info"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-agfire-info.png"
      width="355" height="385" />


 

Agni is the Hindu god of fire. Notice the combination of India and
  China references here. The email address used to register this domain
  was also referenced in a Chinese developer forum, but nothing else
  interesting was discovered about it.


 

The IP addresses hosting the C&C services are scattered all over
  the world and are believed to be compromised hosts.


 


  Attackers, Targets, and Timeline


 

The attackers appear to be the well known and prolific “Comment
  Group” as we had stated in our     href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2013/02/operation-beebus.html">previous
    blog on Operation Beebus. This link was made through finding
  several overlapping IP addresses used by Mutter and Beebus such as the following.


 


        class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1679 landscape-med"
      alt="mutter-c2-link"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-c2-link.png"
      width="784" height="505" />


 

The theme of these attacks appears to be South Asia politics. The
  hints scattered throughout the documents and domain registrant
  information were laid on pretty thick which is something be wary of.
  The only legible, sensible decoy document observed so far is revealing
  of the interests of at least one of the targets of this campaign:
  namely the military threat of Pakistan against India and its growing
  relationships with other countries including China. The particular
  topic of this decoy document also appears to be a common link between
  most of the targets we have seen: unmanned vehicles.


 

The timeline below outlines the events specific to Mutter that we
  had visibility into. This campaign is still ongoing with Mutter
  callbacks being made to this day.


 


        class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1684 landscape-lg"
      alt="mutter-timeline"
      src="/content/dam/legacy/blog/2013/04/mutter-timeline.png"
      width="810" height="541" />


 


  Appendix


 


  Documents


 
   
              class="c09_td" scope="col">Exploit
   
     
                  class="c09_td"> Pakistan’s
            Indigenous UAV industry
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Pakistan’s Indigenous UAV
          industry

       
   
     
       
                  class="c09_td">
        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA           class="c09_td"> Jan 26th
        2003
Jan
          26th 2003

   
     
                  class="c09_td"> Dec 6th
        2011
Dec
          6th 2011

   
     
                  class="c09_td">
        Administrator
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Administrator
       

   
     
                  class="c09_td"> Tariq
        Masud
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Tariq Masud
       

       
Exploit Document MD5         scope="col">Exploit Document Filename         scope="col">Decoy Document Title         scope="col">Decoy Document Author         scope="col">Decoy Document Last Modified         scope="col">First Seen

        b5f4a9aac67b53762ed98fafd067c803
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">b5f4a9aac67b53762ed98fafd067c803
     

        CVE-2012-0158
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">CVE-2012-0158

        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA
          class="is-visible-mml"> GOPAL GURUNG           class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">GOPAL GURUNG Aug 2nd
        2010
Aug
          2nd 2010
          class="is-visible-mml"> Aug 27th 2012
          Aug 27th 2012
     

        92643bfa4121f1960c43c78a3d53568b
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">92643bfa4121f1960c43c78a3d53568b
     

        CVE-2008-3005
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">CVE-2008-3005

        2012_3_12.xls
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">2012_3_12.xls

        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA
          class="is-visible-mml"> Mar 22nd 2012
          Mar 22nd 2012
     

        4d5a235048e94579aab0062057296186
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">4d5a235048e94579aab0062057296186
     

        CVE-2010-3333
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">CVE-2010-3333
Change of
        Address.doc
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Change of Address.doc
     

            Tele: 2619 4428
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Tele: 2619 4428
     

        kdly
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">kdly
          class="is-visible-mml"> Dec 7th 2011           class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Dec 7th 2011

        589f10e2efdd98bfbdc34f247b6a347f
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">589f10e2efdd98bfbdc34f247b6a347f
     

        CVE-2010-3333
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">CVE-2010-3333
Urgent
        message.doc
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Urgent message.doc
     

        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA
Feb 2nd
        2003
Feb
          2nd 2003
          class="is-visible-mml"> Mar 2nd 2012           class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Mar 2nd 2012

        fd9777c90abb4b758b4aff29cfd68b98
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">fd9777c90abb4b758b4aff29cfd68b98
     

        CVE-2012-0158
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">CVE-2012-0158

        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA

        Haroon-ur-Rashid/Administrator
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Haroon-ur-Rashid/Administrator
     

            Sept 11 2012
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Sept 11 2012

         
      class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml"> 

 


  Malware


 
   
              class="c09_td" scope="col">Dropper MD5
       
   
                class="c09_td">
        725fc0d7a8e7b9e01a83111619744b6f
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">725fc0d7a8e7b9e01a83111619744b6f
     
          class="c09_td">
        654234576804d
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">654234576804d
       

   
     
       
       
   
                class="c09_td">
        6aac76fc8309e29ea8a7afea48ae9b29
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">6aac76fc8309e29ea8a7afea48ae9b29
     
          class="c09_td">
        654234576804d
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">654234576804d
       

   
                class="c09_td">
        d5640ae049779bbb068eff08616adb95
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">d5640ae049779bbb068eff08616adb95
     

       
   
     
       
       
   
     
                  class="c09_td">
        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA           class="c09_td">
        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA           class="c09_td">
        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA           class="c09_td">
         
      class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml"> 
Dropper Filename         scope="col">DLL Filename       scope="col">Mutex C&C
      Host
Decoded “i” ValueCompile Time

        update.exe
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">update.exe

        msdsp.dll
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">msdsp.dll

        cdind.antivirup.com:8081
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">cdind.antivirup.com:8081
     

            V0.9.6Y-SN1-<hostname>-<IP
        address>
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">V0.9.6Y-SN1-<hostname>-<IP
          address>
          class="is-visible-mml"> Aug 28th 2012
          Aug 28th 2012
     

        igfxtray.exe
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">igfxtray.exe

        681a014e9d221c1003c54a2a9a1d9df8
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">681a014e9d221c1003c54a2a9a1d9df8
     

        winsups.dll
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">winsups.dll

        mqe45tex13fw14op0
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">mqe45tex13fw14op0
     

        http.4pu.com:80
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">http.4pu.com:80
     

            V0.7-SN0-<hostname>-<IP
        address>
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">V0.7-SN0-<hostname>h;-<IP
          address>
          class="is-visible-mml"> Aug 28th 2012
          Aug 28th 2012
     

        NA
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">NA

        msdsp.dll
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">msdsp.dll

        oracledata.ns01.us:80
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">oracledata.ns01.us:80
     

            V0.9.6X-SN1-<hostname>-<IP
        address>
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">V0.9.6X-SN1-<hostname>-<IP
          address>
          class="is-visible-mml"> Aug 12th 2012
          Aug 12th 2012
     

        ctfmon.exe
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">ctfmon.exe

        winsups.dll
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">winsups.dll

        mqe45tex13fw14op0
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">mqe45tex13fw14op0
     

        mydns.dns2.us:443
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">mydns.dns2.us:443
     

            V0.7-SN0-<hostname>-<IP
        address>
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">V0.7-SN0-<hostname>-<IP
          address>
          class="is-visible-mml"> Aug 2nd 2010           class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Aug 2nd 2010

        igfxtray.exe
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">igfxtray.exe

        681a014e9d221c1003c54a2a9a1d9df8
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">681a014e9d221c1003c54a2a9a1d9df8
     

        winsups.dll
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">winsups.dll

        mqe45tex13fw14op0
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">mqe45tex13fw14op0
     

        http.4pu.com:80
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">http.4pu.com:80
     

            V0.7-SN0-<hostname>-<IP
        address>
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">V0.7-SN0-<hostname>-<IP
          address>
          class="is-visible-mml"> Aug 2nd 2010           class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">Aug 2nd 2010

        igfxpers.exe
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">igfxpers.exe

        06d5dddd4c349f666d84a91d6edc4f8d
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">06d5dddd4c349f666d84a91d6edc4f8d
     

        msdsp.dll
          class="c09_td_value is-hidden-mml">msdsp.dll

 

Thanks to Darien Kindlund for his assistance in research.


Source: The Mutter Backdoor: Operation Beebus with New Targets

Tags: