Mandiant Discloses Critical Vulnerability Affecting Millions of IoT DevicesToday, Mandiant disclosed a critical risk vulnerability in
coordination with the href="https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-21-229-01">Cybersecurity
and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”) that affects
millions of IoT devices that use the href="https://www.throughtek.com/overview/">ThroughTek “Kalay”
network. This vulnerability, discovered by researchers on Mandiant’s
Red Team in late 2020, would enable adversaries to remotely compromise
victim IoT devices, resulting in the ability to listen to live audio,
watch real time video data, and compromise device credentials for
further attacks based on exposed device functionality. These further
attacks could include actions that would allow an adversary to
remotely control affected devices.
At the time of writing this blog post, ThroughTek advertises having
more than 83 million active devices and over 1.1 billion monthly
connections on their platform. ThroughTek’s clients include href="https://www.throughtek.com/case-studies/">IoT camera
manufacturers, href="https://en.prnasia.com/releases/apac/throughtek-the-global-push-for-baby-care-cameras-industry-protect-mothers-and-babies-and-safeguard-home-safety-298126.shtml">smart
baby monitors, and Digital Video Recorder (“DVR”) products.
Unlike the vulnerability published by researchers from href="https://www.nozominetworks.com/blog/new-iot-security-risk-throughtek-p2p-supply-chain-vulnerability/">Nozomi
Networks in May 2021 (also in coordination with CISA), this latest
vulnerability allows attackers to communicate with devices remotely.
As a result, further attacks could include actions that would allow an
adversary to remotely control affected devices and could potentially
lead to remote code execution.
The Kalay protocol is implemented as a Software Development Kit
(“SDK”) which is built into client software (e.g. a mobile or desktop
application) and networked IoT devices, such as smart cameras. Due to
how the Kalay protocol is integrated by original equipment
manufacturers (“OEMs”) and resellers before devices reach consumers,
Mandiant is unable to determine a complete list of products and
companies affected by the discovered vulnerability.
This vulnerability has been assigned a CVSS3.1 base score of 9.6 and
is tracked as href="https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-28372">CVE-2021-28372
and href="https://github.com/fireeye/Vulnerability-Disclosures/blob/master/FEYE-2021-0020/FEYE-2021-0020.md">FEYE-2021-0020.
This blog post discusses the Kalay network and CVE-2021-28372 at a
high level. It also includes recommendations from ThroughTek and
Mandiant, along with mitigation options.
Mandiant would like to thank both CISA and ThroughTek for their
coordination and support in releasing this advisory.
FAQ
What devices are affected, and (potentially) how many devices are affected?
The vulnerabilities described in this post affect a core component
of the Kalay platform. Mandiant was not able to create a comprehensive
list of affected devices; however, ThroughTek’s website reports more
than 83 million active devices on the Kalay platform at the time of
writing this post.
How is the issue being addressed?
Mandiant worked with ThroughTek and CISA to disclose this
vulnerability and would strongly recommend companies using the Kalay
platform follow the guidance provided by ThroughTek and Mandiant:
- If the implemented SDK is below version 3.1.10, upgrade the
library to version 3.3.1.0 or version 3.4.2.0 and enable the Authkey
and Datagram Transport Layer Security (“DTLS”) features provided by
the Kalay platform. - If the implemented SDK is version
3.1.10 and above, enable Authkey and DTLS. - Review security
controls in place on APIs or other services that return Kalay unique
identifiers (“UIDs”).
How would an attacker exploit these vulnerabilities?
An attacker would require comprehensive knowledge of the Kalay
protocol and the ability to generate and send messages. The attacker
would also need to obtain Kalay UIDs through social engineering or
other vulnerabilities in APIs or services that return Kalay UIDs. From
there, an attacker would be able to remotely compromise affected
devices that correspond to the obtained UIDs.
How do I know if a device I own is affected? How do I protect
myself if I own an affected device?
Mandiant was not able to create a comprehensive list of devices
using the Kalay platform, but strongly encourages users of IoT devices
to keep device software and applications up to date and use complex,
unique passwords for any accounts associated with these devices.
Device owners should avoid connecting to affected devices from
untrusted networks such as public wireless networks.
Who discovered this vulnerability?
Jake Valletta, Erik Barzdukas, and Dillon Franke.
CVE-2021-28372: Device Impersonation
Mandiant researchers analyzed ThroughTek’s Kalay protocol using two
different approaches. First, the researchers selectively downloaded
and disassembled applications from both the Google Play Store and
Apple App Store that included ThroughTek libraries. These libraries
typically did not contain debugging symbols, which required the team
to also perform dynamic analysis with tools such as href="https://frida.re/">Frida, href="https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/">gdb, and Wireshark.
In addition, Mandiant purchased various Kalay-enabled devices. The
team performed local and hardware-based attacks to obtain shell
access, recover firmware images, and perform additional dynamic
testing. These techniques included identifying UART/JTAG interfaces,
performing chip-off attacks, and exploiting other debugging
functionality present on the devices.
Over the course of several months, the researchers developed a fully
functional implementation of ThroughTek’s Kalay protocol, which
enabled the team to perform key actions on the network, including
device discovery, device registration, remote client connections,
authentication, and most importantly, process audio and video (“AV”)
data. Equally as important as processing AV data, the Kalay protocol
also implements href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_procedure_call">remote
procedure call (“RPC”) functionality. This varies from device to
device but typically is used for device telemetry, firmware updates,
and device control.
Having written a flexible interface for creating and manipulating
Kalay requests and responses, Mandiant researchers focused on
identifying logic and flow vulnerabilities in the Kalay protocol. The
vulnerability discussed in this post affects how Kalay-enabled devices
access and join the Kalay network. The researchers determined that the
device registration process requires only the device’s 20-byte
uniquely assigned identifier (called a “UID” here) to access the
network. In Mandiant’s testing, this UID was typically provided to a
Kalay-enabled client (such as a mobile application) from a web API
hosted by the company that markets and sells a device model. Mandiant
investigated the viability of brute forcing ThroughTek UIDs and found
it to be infeasible due to the necessary time and resources.
Figure 1 shows a typical device registration and client connection
process on the Kalay network. The example scenario is a user remotely
accessing their camera feed on a mobile application from a remote
network, (e.g. a coffee shop or mobile phone network) with their
Kalay-enabled camera located on their home network.
src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/throughtek-vulns/fig1.gif" alt="" />
Figure 1: Normal device registration and
connection process
If an attacker obtains a UID of a victim Kalay device, they can
maliciously register a device with the same UID on the network and
cause the Kalay servers to overwrite the existing Kalay device. Once
an attacker has maliciously registered a UID, any client connection
attempts to access the victim UID will be directed to the attacker.
The attacker can then continue the connection process and obtain the
authentication materials (a username and password) needed to access
the device. Figure 2 shows a client connection attempt when both a
victim device and a malicious device with the same UID exist
simultaneously on the network. In this example, the malicious
registration is overwriting the existing registration on the network,
causing client connections to be mistakenly routed to the malicious device.
src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/throughtek-vulns/fig2.gif" alt="" />
Figure 2: Attacker exploiting device
personation vulnerability to capture credentials
With the compromised credentials, an attacker can use the Kalay
network to remotely connect to the original device, access AV data,
and execute RPC calls. Vulnerabilities in the device-implemented RPC
interface can lead to fully remote and complete device compromise.
Mandiant observed that the binaries on IoT devices processing Kalay
data typically ran as the privileged user root and lacked common
binary protections such as Address Space Layout Randomization
(“ASLR”), Platform Independent Execution (“PIE”), stack canaries, and
NX bits.
Figure 3 shows a hypothetical attack utilizing the captured Kalay
username and password to stage a further attack by abusing
vulnerabilities in the Kalay RPC interface.
src="https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/images/throughtek-vulns/fig3.gif" alt="" />
Figure 3: Attacker using captured
credentials to fetch audio/video data
The following video (Figure 4) demonstrates a functional proof of
concept for CVE-2021-28372. Note that Mandiant is not releasing any
public exploit code.
Source:
Mandiant Discloses Critical Vulnerability Affecting Millions of IoT Devices
