Auteur Sujet: [FireEye]Surge in Spam Campaign Delivering Locky Ransomware Downloaders  (Lu 3049 fois)

0 Membres et 1 Invité sur ce sujet

Hors ligne igor51

  • Admin
  • Mega Power Members
  • *****
  • Messages: 10419
Surge in Spam Campaign Delivering Locky Ransomware Downloaders

FireEye Labs is detecting a significant spike in Locky ransomware
  downloaders due to a pair of concurrent email spam campaigns impacting
  users in over 50 countries. Some of the top affected countries are
  depicted in Figure 1.


 


 
  Figure 1. Affected countries


 

As seen in Figure 2, the steep spike starts on March 21, 2016, where
  Locky is running campaigns that coincide with the new Dridex campaigns
  that were discussed in the blog,     href="/content/fireeye-www/en_US/blog/threat-research/2016/03/stop_scanning_mymac.html">“Stop
    Scanning My Macro”.


 


 


 


  Figure 2. Detection on spam delivered malware


 

Prior to Locky’s emergence in February 2016, Dridex was known to be
  responsible for a relatively higher volume of email spam campaigns.
  However, as shown in Figure 3, we can see that Locky is catching up
  with Dridex’s spam activities. This is especially true for this week,
  as we are seeing more Locky-related spam themes than Dridex. On top of
  that, we also are seeing Dridex and Locky running campaigns on the
  same day, which resulted in an abnormal detection spike.


 


 


 


  Figure 3. Dridex versus Locky spam campaign over time


 
Locky Ransomware spam 

 

The new Locky spam campaign uses several themes such as “invoice
  notice”, “attached image”, and “attached document themes”. See Figure
  4 and Figure 5 for example campaign emails.


 


 


 


  Figure 4. Urgent Invoice Campaign


 


 


 


  Figure 5. Other Campaigns


 

The ZIP attachment as depicted in Figure 6 contains a malicious
  JavaScript downloader that downloads and installs the Locky ransomware.


 


 


 


  Figure 6. Zipped Content


 

In Figure 7, it is interesting to see that the recent Locky campaign
  seems to prefer using a JavaScript-based downloader in comparison to
  Microsoft Word and Excel macro-based downloaders, which were seen
  being used in its early days.


 


 


 


  Figure 7. Locky Downloader Mechanism


 

The preference for JavaScript downloaders could be due to the ease
  to transform or obfuscate the script via automation to generate new
  variants as depicted in Figure 8. As a result, the traditional
  signature-based solution may not keep up with the variants where its
  behavioral intent is the same. At the time of discovery, most of the
  samples that we see are being detected by only one vendor, according
  to VirusTotal.


 


 


 


  Figure 8. Obfuscated JavaScript code


 
Conclusions

 

The volume of Locky ransomware downloaders observed is increasing
  and it may potentially replace the Dridex downloader as the top
  spammer. One of the latest victims of Locky is Methodist Hospital  name="_ftnref1">[1], where the victim was reportedly forced to pay
  a ransom to retrieve their encrypted data. This suggests that the
  cybercriminals are earning more from ransomware and this drives their
  aggressive campaigns.


 

On top of that, JavaScript downloaders seem to be the preferred
  medium for delivering its payload as it could be easily obfuscated to
  create new variants.


 
Technical Analysis of a Locky Payload Sample

 

MD5 Sum: 3F118D0B888430AB9F58FC2589207988 (First seen on 2016-02-24
  in VirusTotal)


 
Persistence Mechanism

 
  • The malware does not contain a persistence mechanism. An
        external tool or installer is required if the attacker desires
      persistence.
  • The malware contains the ability to install the
        following registry key for persistence; this functionality is
        disabled in this variant.

               
    • HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\Locky

                 
      • <path_to_malware>

 
File System Artifacts

 
  • The malware encrypts files on the system and creates new files
        with the encrypted contents in the same directory with the following
        naming convention:
    • <system identifier><16 random
              hex digits>.locky
    • The <system identifier>
              value is the ASCII hexadecimal representation of the first eight
              bytes of the MD5 hash of the GUID of the system volume.

    •    
  • The malware drops a ransom note provided by the C2
        server in all directories with encrypted files and on the desktop of
        the current user:
    • _Locky_recover_instructions.txt

     
  • The malware drops an image on the desktop of the current
          user:
    • _Locky_recover_instructions.bmp

 
Registry Artifacts

 
  • The malware creates the registry key HKCU\Software\Locky.

             
    • id is set to a unique identifier generated for the
              compromised system.
    • pubkey is set to a binary buffer
              that contains a public RSA key.
    • paytext is set to a
              binary buffer containing the recovery instructions.

    •        
    • completed is set to 1.
  • The malware
        changes the desktop background to a bitmap containing the ransom
          instructions.
    • HKCU\Control Panel\Desktop\Wallpaper is set
              to:
            %CSIDL_DESKTOPDIRECTORY%\_Locky_recover_instructions.bmp

    •    

 

Network-Based Signatures


 
Command and Control (CnC)

 
  • The malware communicates with the following hard-coded hosts
        using HTTP over TCP port 80. The malware also uses a domain name
        generation algorithm as described below.
    • 188.138.88.184

    •      
    • 31.41.47.37
    • 5.34.183.136
    • 91.121.97.170

    •    

 
Beacon Packet

 
  • The malware beacon builds a HTTP POST request to /main.php as
        shown in Figure 9. The POST data is encoded using a custom
      algorithm.

 


 


 


  Figure 9. HTTP POST request polling packet
    (general packet structure)


 
Domain Generation Algorithm (DGA)

 

This sample contains a domain name generation algorithm that is
  based on the current month, day and year. There are eight possible
  domains per day and the domains change on the first of the month and
  on even numbered days. Figure 10 contains Python code to generate the
  eight possible domain names for the current date.


 

 


 


 


 


 
 Figure 10. Locky Domain Generation Algorithm
 
 


 

[1] http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/03/kentucky-hospital-hit-by-ransomware-attack/


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


Source: Surge in Spam Campaign Delivering Locky Ransomware Downloaders

Tags: